4.6 Article

Desflurane Selectively Suppresses Long-latency Cortical Neuronal Response to Flash in the Rat

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 2, 页码 231-239

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ab671e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [R01 GM-56398]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The effect of inhalational anesthetics on sensory-evoked unit activity In the cerebral cortex has been controversial. Desflurane has desirable properties for in vivo neurophysiologic studies, but its effect on cortical neuronal activity and neuronal responsiveness is not known. The authors studied the effect of desflurane on resting and visual evoked unit activity in rat visual cortex in vivo. Methods: Desflurane was administered to adult albino rats at steady-state concentrations at 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%. Flashes from a fight emitting diode were delivered to the left eye at 5-s intervals. Extracellular unit activity within the right visual cortex was recorded using a 49-electrode array. individual units were identified using principal components analysis. Results: At 2% desflurane, 578 active units were found. Of these, 75% increased their firing rate in response to flash. Most responses contained early (0-100 ms) and late (150-1000 ms) components. With increasing desflurane concentration, the number of units active at baseline decreased (-13%), the number of early-responding units Increased (+31%), and number of late-responding units decreased (-15%). Simultaneously, baseline firing rate decreased (-77%), the early response was unchanged, and the late response decreased (-60%). Conclusions. The results Indicate that visual cortex neurons remain responsive to flash stimulation under desflurane anesthesia, but the long-latency component of their response is attenuated In a concentration-dependent manner. Suppression of the long-latency response may be related to a loss of corti-cocortical feedback and loss of consciousness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据