4.4 Article

Nutritional supplementation in age-related macular degeneration

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 220-223

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32814a586b

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; antioxidant vitamins; long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; lutein/zeaxanthin; macular edema; zinc

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 EY999999, ZIA EY000489-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This review assesses the current status of the knowledge of the role of nutrition in age-related macular degeneration - a leading cause of vision loss in the persons with European ancestry. Recent findings We will evaluate the different nutritional factors and both observational and interventional studies used to assess the association of nutrition with age-related macular degeneration. Persons with intermediate risk of age-related macular degeneration or advanced age-related macular degeneration in one eye are recommended to take the formulation proven in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) to be successful in preventing the development of advanced age-related macular degeneration by 25%. The formulation consists of vitamins C, E, beta-carotene and zinc. In addition, observational data suggest that high dietary intake of macular xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin are associated with a lower risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration. Similarly, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids derived from fish consumption are also associated with a decreased risk of advanced age-related macular degeneration. Summary Persons with intermediate age-related macular degeneration or advanced age-related macular degeneration (neovascular or central geographic atrophy) in one eye should consider taking the AREDS-type supplements. Further evaluation of nutritional factors, specifically, lutein/zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids will be tested in a multicenter controlled, randomized trial - the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据