4.6 Article

Ethyl Pyruvate Attenuates Spinal Cord Ischemic Injury with a Wide Therapeutic Window through Inhibiting High-mobility Group Box 1 Release in Rabbits

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 1279-1286

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a160d6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [30725039]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (Beijing, China) [30772826, 30873326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ethyl pyruvate (EP) has been reported to offer a protective effect against ischemic injury through its antiinflammatory action. The nuclear protein high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) can activate inflammatory pathways when released from ischemic cells. This study was designed to investigate the neuroprotective effect of EP against spinal cord ischemic injury and the potential role of HMGB1 in this process. Methods: EP was administered at various time points before or after 20 min of spinal cord ischemia in male New Zealand rabbits. All animals were sacrificed at 72 h after reperfusion with modified Tarlov criteria, and the spinal cord segment (L4) was harvested for histopathological examination and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling staining. The HMGB1 levels In serum and spinal cord tissue were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The treatment of EP at 30 min before ischemia or at 6 h after reperfusion significantly improved the hind-linib motor function scores and increased the numbers of normal motor neurons, which was accompanied with reduction of the number of apoptotic neurons and levels of HMGB1 in serum and spinal cord tissue. The HMGB1 contents of spinal cord tissue correlated well with the numbers of apoptotic motor neurons in the anterior spinal cord at 72 It after reperfusion. Conclusion: These results suggest that EP affords a strong protection against the transient spinal cord ischemic injury with a wide therapeutic window through inhibition of HMGB1 release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据