4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Recycling of automobile shredder residues by means of pyrolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 79, 期 1-2, 页码 403-408

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.12.002

关键词

automobile shredder residues; ASR; pyrolysis; thermolysis; recycling; feedstock recycling; end-of-life vehicles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automobile shredder residues (ASR) are the rejection of the present processes of metal recovery of end-of-life vehicles. They are composed of several plastics, foams, glasses, rubbers, textiles, remaining metals, soils, etc., and have no clear recycling alternative. In the pyrolysis process (heating to moderate temperatures without oxygen), the organic volatile matter of the waste (plastics, rubber, etc.) is decomposed to gases and liquids, which can be useful as fuels and/or chemicals source. The inorganic components (fillers, metals, glasses, etc.) can be recovered and reused. Therefore, pyrolysis is especially appropriate for recycling complex wastes, such as ASR. In this paper an experimental study of pyrolysis of real ASR samples coming from an autornotibile shredder plant (light and heavy ASR) have been studied. The pyrolysis experiments have been carried out in a non-stirred batch 3.5 dm(3) autoclave at 400, 500 and 700 degrees C for 30 min. The raw samples, as well as the solid, liquid and gaseous pyrolysis products have been thoroughly characterized. It is concluded that pyrolysis appears to be an appropriate technique for recycling the heavy ASR, since valuable solids (38-39%), liquids (20-29%) and gases (31-41%) are obtained, while this is not the case for the light ASR, which does not yield valuable products. Concerning temperature 500 degrees C is enough to produce total decomposition of the ASR organic matter. Increasing temperature over 500 degrees C increases gases to the detriment of liquids, but hardly varies the characteristics of the products. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据