4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Cutaneous amitriptyline in human volunteers -: Differential effects on the components of sensory information

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 714-721

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181672632

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Amitriptyline is effective in relieving neuropathic pain. Its site of action is thought to be supraspinal and spinal, but a peripheral effect on fibers is also suggested. Methods: This double-blind study examined the effects of transcutaneous amitriptyline diluted in hydroalcoholic solution in healthy young male volunteers. Six treatments were randomly applied on different areas of the skin of the back: amitriptyline at 0 (vehicle), 25, 50, and 100 mm; saline (control); and lidocaine-prilocaine cream as a positive control. Up to 24 h after application, mechanical thresholds for touch and nociception, and thermal thresholds for cold, warm, and heat sensation were recorded for each area. Blood samples were collected to assess plasma levels of amitriptyline. A late recording of the tactile thresholds was performed 1 and 3 weeks after the treatment session. Results: The thresholds for all sensations did not differ between the vehicle and saline. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream displayed a short-lasting anesthetic effect for all sensations, although this was not significant for warm sensation. Amitriptyline, at the three concentrations studied, induced a mad and short-lasting increase of the tactile and mechanical nociceptive thresholds. it significantly decreased cold thresholds (down to 21.8 degrees C, P = 0.01 vs. 27.5 degrees C for control) and heat thresholds (down to 40.1 degrees C, P = 0.004 vs. 43.4 degrees C for control). These two effects were no longer significant after the fourth hour of observation. Amitriptyline did not change warm thresholds. There was no apparent systemic absorption effect of the drug. Conclusion: It is hypothesized that amitriptyline has a differential effect on different fiber structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据