4.7 Article

Role of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 in the kidney

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1466-1475

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2006040343

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK069896] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) is one of the most ubiquitous prostanoids in the kidney, where it may influence a wide range of physiologic functions. PGE(2) is generated through enzymatic metabolism of prostanoid endoperoxides by specific PGE synthases (PGES). Several putative PGES have been identified and cloned, including the membrane-associated, inducible microsomal PGES1 (mPGES1), which is expressed in the kidney. To evaluate the physiologic role of mPGES1 in the kidney, mice with targeted disruption of mPges1 gene were studied, with a focus on responses where PGE(2) has been implicated, including urinary concentration, regulation of blood pressure, and response to a loop diuretic. The absence of mPGES1 was associated with a 50% decrease in basal excretion of PGE(2) in urine (P < 0.001). In female but not male mPGES1-deficient mice, there was a reciprocal increase in basal excretion of other prostanoids. Nonetheless, urinary osmolalities were similar in mPges1(+/+) and mPges1(-/-) mice at baseline and after 12 h of water deprivation. Likewise, there were no differences in blood pressure between mPGES1-deficient and wild-type mice on control or high- or low-salt diets. The furosemide-induced increase in urinary PGE(2) excretion that was seen in wild-type mice was attenuated in mPGES1-deficient mice. However, furosemide-associated diuresis was reduced only in male, not female, mPGES1-deficient mice. Stimulation of renin by furosemide was not affected by mPGES1 deficiency. These data suggest that mPGES1 contributes to basal synthesis of PGE(2), but there are other pathways that lead to renal PGE(2) synthesis. Moreover, there are significant gender differences in physiologic contributions of mPGES1 to control kidney function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据