4.4 Article

Broad up-regulation of innate defense factors during acute cholera

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 2343-2350

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01900-06

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used a whole-genome microarray screening system (Affymetrix human GeneChips covering 47,000 different transcripts) to examine the gene expression in duodenal mucosa during acute cholera. Biopsies were taken from the duodenal mucosa of seven cholera patients 2 and 30 days after the onset of diarrhea, and the gene expression patterns in the acute- and convalescent-phase samples were compared pairwise. Of about 21,000 transcripts expressed in the intestinal epithelium, 29 were defined as transcripts that were up-regulated and 33 were defined as transcripts that were down-regulated during acute cholera. The majority of the up-regulated genes characterized were found to have an established or possible role in the innate defense against infections; these genes included the LPLUNC1, LF, VCC1, TCN1, CD55, SERPINA3, MMP1, MMP3, IL1B, LCN2, SOCS3, GDF15, SLPI, CXCL13, and MUC1 genes. The results of confirmative PCR correlated well with the microarray data. An immunohistochemical analysis revealed increased expression of lactoferrin in lamina propria cells and increased expression of CD55 in epithelial cells, whereas increased expression of the SERPINA3 protein (alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin) was detected in both lamina propria and epithelial cells during acute cholera. The expression pattern of CD55 and SERPINA3 in cholera toxin (CT)-stimulated Caco-2 cells was the same as the pattern found in the intestinal mucosa during acute cholera, indicating that the activation of the CD55 and SERPINA3 genes in intestinal epithelium was induced by CT. In conclusion, during acute cholera infection, innate defense mechanisms are switched on to an extent not described previously. Both direct effects of CT on the epithelial cells and changes in the lamina propria cells contribute to this up-regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据