4.3 Article

Development of a multistage classifier for a monitoring system of cell activity based on imaging of chromosomal dynamics

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART A
卷 71A, 期 5, 页码 286-296

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20378

关键词

multistage linear discriminant classifier; cell-cycle phases; classification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cell-based assays utilizing digital image cytometry yield multivariate sets of information measuring the efficacy of medicines/chemicals. The use of a HeLa cell line that expresses a GFP-Histone-H1 fusion protein further enhances the performance of these systems, avoiding the use of dyes that may have detrimental influence on cells. Aside from the mitotic index, the distribution of the cell-cycle phases during mitosis can be used as measures of drug/treatment efficacy. Quantification of these parameters, however, requires skill and is time consuming. The purpose of this research was therefore to create a classifier to be incorporated into a system that can automaiically identify the cell-cycle phases in a given image. Methods: Features based on the shape and texture of the chromosomal regions in images of live Hela cells were measured and analyzed. linear discriminant functions were calculated for the eight cell-cycle phases: interphase, prophase, prometaphase, metaphase, early anaphase, anaphase, telophase and cytokinesis. Results: The multistage linear discriminant classifier developed had an average classification efficiency of 87-30%. Conclusion: We demonstrated the possibility of creating a classifier to discriminate between cell-cycle phases using shape and texture features of chromosomal regions. The classifier can be fused to an algorithm for image segmentation, forming a system to automatically and rapidly measure the aforementioned parameters. The results can then be collated to constitute an assay assessing the effects of a drug or treatment on mammalian cells. (c) 2007 International Society for Analytical Cytology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据