4.6 Article

Anesthetic Preconditioning Inhibits Isoflurane-Mediated Apoptosis in the Developing Rat Brain

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 939-946

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000380

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medicine (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD [GM 073224, GM084979, GM084979 02S1]
  2. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, White Plains, NY [12-FY08-167]
  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that preconditioning (PC) with a short exposure to isoflurane (ISO) would reduce neurodegeneration induced by prolonged exposure to ISO in neonatal rats, as previously shown in neuronal cell culture. METHODS: We randomly divided 7-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats into 3 groups: control, 1.5% ISO, and PC + 1.5% ISO. The control group was exposed to carrier gas (30% oxygen balanced in nitrogen) for 30 minutes and then to carrier gas again for 6 hours the following day. The 1.5% ISO group was exposed to carrier gas for 30 minutes and then to 1.5% ISO for 6 hours the following day. The PC + 1.5% ISO group was preconditioned with a 30-minute 1.5% ISO exposure and then exposed to 1.5% ISO for 6 hours the following day. Blood and brain samples were collected 2 hours after the exposures for determination of neurodegenerative biomarkers, including caspase-3, S100 beta, caspase-12, and an autophagy biomarker Beclin-1. RESULTS: Prolonged exposure to ISO significantly increased cleaved caspase-3 expression in the cerebral cortex of 7-day-old rats compared with the group preconditioned with ISO and the controls using Western blot assays. However, significant differences were not detected for other markers of neuronal injury. CONCLUSIONS: The ISO-mediated increase in cleaved caspase-3 in the postnatal day 7 rat brain is ameliorated by PC with a brief anesthetic exposure, and differences were not detected in other markers of neuronal injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据