4.5 Article

Further evidence for individual differences in placebo responding: An interactionist perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 563-570

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.12.005

关键词

expectations; optimism; personality; pessimism; placebo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: A prior investigation found that individuals low in optimism are more likely to follow a negative placebo (nocebo) expectation. The present study tested the hypothesis that individuals high in optimism are more likely to follow a positive placebo expectation. Methods: Individuals (N = 56) varying in their level of optimism were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In the first condition, participants were given the expectation that a placebo sleep treatment would improve their sleep quality (placebo expectation condition). In the second condition, participants engaged in the same sleep treatment activity but were not given the positive placebo expectation (treatment control condition). Finally, a third group did not receive the positive placebo expectation and also did not engage in the placebo sleep treatment (no-placebo control condition). Results: Optimism was positively associated with better sleep quality in the placebo expectation condition (r = .48, P < .05). Optimism scores were not associated with better sleep quality in either the treatment control condition (r = -.17, P = .46) or the no-placebo control condition (r = -.24, P = 35). Conclusion: Dispositional optimism relates to placebo responding. This relationship, however, is not manifested in a simple increase or decrease in all types of placebo responding. Rather, it appears that, as optimism increases, response to the positive placebo expectation increases, whereas response to nocebo expectation decreases. It is recommended that future research on personality and placebo effects consider the interaction between situational and dispositional variables. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据