4.5 Article

Evidence for an estradiol-agonistic action of nebivolol in spontaneously hypertensive rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1001-1007

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280987710

关键词

caveolin; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; estradiol; nebivolol; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Unlike classical beta 1-selective blockers, nebivolol (NEB) has vasodilatory properties due to the release of nitric oxide (NO) by a mechanism that is, so far, unknown. We hypothesized that NEB stimulates NO release by binding to estrogen receptors (ER) and subsequent activation of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). The aim of this study was to elucidate the underlying mechanism of NEB action by investigating estradiol-dependent effects of NEB on the NO system in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Methods The effects of NEB on the NO system were determined by measuring urinary nitrate/nitrite (NOx) as well as eNOS and caveolin-1 protein expression in aortae. Results NEB did not influence NOx excretion in sham-operated ( SO) female rats during proestrus. In male and ovariectomized female (OVX) rats, NEB increased NOx excretion significantly, whereas N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) inhibited the NEB-induced increase in NOx. ER blockade with ICI182,780 prevented NEB-induced NOx excretion in OVX rats. In the aortae of SO females, NEB treatment did not alter eNOS expression. In OVX rats eNOS expression was increased two-fold after NEB application and this could be prevented by pretreatment with ICI182,780. In contrast to eNOS, NEB did not influence caveolin-1 expression in either group. Conclusion The ability of NEB to up-regulate NOx excretion in male and OVX SHR and the inhibitory effect of ICI182,780 on NEB-induced NOx excretion suggests that NEB has an estradiol-agonistic action in vivo. NEB provokes NO generation by up-regulation of eNOS protein expression, whereas the expression of the negative eNOS regulator caveolin-1 remains unaffected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据