4.8 Article

Guanines are a quartet's best friend: impact of base substitutions on the kinetics and stability of tetramolecular quadruplexes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 3064-3075

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm111

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parallel tetramolecular quadruplexes may be formed with short oligodeoxynucleotides bearing a block of three or more guanines. We analyze the properties of sequence variants of parallel quadruplexes in which each guanine of the central block was systematically substituted with a different base. Twelve types of substitutions were assessed in more than 100 different sequences. We conducted a comparative kinetic analysis of all tetramers. Electrospray mass spectrometry was used to count the number of inner cations, which is an indicator of the number of effective tetrads. In general, the presence of a single substitution has a strong deleterious impact on quadruplex stability, resulting in reduced quadruplex lifetime/ thermal stability and in decreased association rate constants. We demonstrate extremely large differences in the association rate constants of these quadruplexes depending on modification position and type. These results demonstrate that most guanine substitutions are deleterious to tetramolecular quadruplex structure. Despite the presence of well- defined non- guanine base quartets in a number of NMR and X- ray structures, our data suggest that most non- guanine quartets do not participate favorably in structural stability, and that these quartets are formed only by virtue of the docking platform provided by neighboring G- quartets. Two notable exceptions were found with 8- bromoguanine ( X) and 6- methyl- isoxanthopterin ( P) substitutions, which accelerate quadruplex formation by a factor of 10 when present at the 50 end. The thermodynamic and kinetic data compiled here are highly valuable for the design of DNA quadruplex assemblies with tunable association/ dissociation properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据