4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Substantial shared genetic influences on schizophrenia and event-related potentials

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 164, 期 5, 页码 804-812

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.5.804

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research [PDA/02/06/016] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NEI NIH HHS [EY-12562] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-16259-28] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [064971] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Department of Health [PDA/02/06/016] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Several components of event-related potentials-P50 suppression, P300 amplitude and latency, and mismatch negativity-have been proposed as potential endophenotypes for schizophrenia on the basis of family studies. The present study used a twin design to estimate the extent of genetic overlap between these indices and the liability to schizophrenia. Method: The authors measured mismatch negativity, P300, and P50 suppression in 16 monozygotic twin pairs concordant for schizophrenia, nine monozygotic twin pairs discordant for schizophrenia, and 78 healthy comparison twin pairs. The study design was based on a power calculation. Structural equation modeling was used to quantify the genetic and environmental contributions to the phenotypic covariance between schizophrenia and each of the event-related potential indices. Results: Significant phenotypic correlation with schizophrenia was found for each of the event-related potential components. Genetic factors were the main source of the phenotypic correlations. P50 suppression had the greatest genetic correlation with schizophrenia, followed by P300 amplitude, P300 latency, and mismatch negativity. Conclusions: All four event-related potential indices are potentially valid endophenotypes for schizophrenia, but P50 suppression and P300 amplitude show the closest genetic relationship to schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据