4.5 Article

Assessing routine and serum markers of liver fibrosis in CHB patients using parallel and serial interpretation

期刊

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 562-566

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.01.022

关键词

parallel testing; serial testing; ROC curve; liver fibrosis; non-invasive marker; chronic hepatitis B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the cut-offs of serum biomarkers of liver fibrosis in HBsAg-positive patients by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and to determine the validity of these markers in parallel and serial interpretation. Methods: This study included 444 HBsAg-positive patients who had liver biopsy performed between January 1, 2003 and March 31, 2006. Some routine and clinical chemistry tests were run, and the stage of liver fibrosis was measured. The cut-offs of those markers were identified by using ROC curves. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (both positive and negative), and the Youden's index of these markers were calculated in parallel and serial interpretation. Results: The 444 patients were divided into a training group (322 patients) and a validation group (122 patients). All markers except gender, HB and TP were found to be statistically significant factors associated with significant fibrosis in the training group. The AUROC of GGT, APRI, AGE-PLT and AST in the training group were 0.772, 0.769, 0.748 and 0.700, respectively, and their sensitivities in the validation group were 65.00%, 70.00%, 75.00% and 60.00%, respectively. In parallel interpretation, the highest sensitivity was 85.00% at AGE-PLT boolean OR AST, and in serial interpretation, the best specificity was 96.34% at GGT boolean AND AGE-PLT. Conclusion: A few routine and serum biomarkers can be used to effectively assess most patients with HBsAg-positive CH13 with and without significant liver fibrosis in parallel and serial interpretation. (c) 2007 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据