4.7 Article

Rapid determination of rice cultivar responses to the sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani using a micro-chamber screening method

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 485-489

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0485

关键词

Oryza sativa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate greenhouse screening method has not been developed previously to identify host response to sheath blight disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn that causes significant economic losses in rice yield worldwide. The unavailability of a robust screening system in the greenhouse has made it difficult to quantify disease reactions to R. solani, and has hampered studies on the genetics of resistance and plant breeding efforts to improve resistance. In an effort to develop a standardized laboratory micro-chamber screening method to quantify resistance to R. solani in rice, five rice cultivars, representing a wide range of observed disease reactions under field conditions, were examined in a blind inoculation test at three locations (Arkansas, Texas, and Colombia). Rice seedlings were inoculated at the three- to four-leaf stage with potato dextrose agar plugs containing mycelium and then covered with a 2- or 3-liter transparent plastic bottle for maintaining high humidity after inoculation. Two cultivars, Jasmine 85 and Lemont, that consistently have shown the highest and lowest levels of resistance, respectively, in previous field and greenhouse studies, were used as standards. Concurrent field experiments in Arkansas and Texas also were performed to compare the greenhouse disease ratings with those observed under field conditions. Overall, the relative disease ratings of the seven test cultivars were consistent between test locations and with field evaluations. Thus, the micro-chamber screening method can be used as an effective approach to accurately quantify resistance to the sheath blight pathogen under controlled greenhouse conditions and should help expedite the selection process to improve resistance to this important pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据