4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cytotoxic effects of 2-arylbenzofuran phytoestrogens on human cancer cells: Modulation by adrenal and gonadal steroids

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.03.028

关键词

arylbenzofurans; Onobrychis ebenoides; leguminosae; estradiol; dehydroepiandrosterone; anticancer activity; breast cancer; MCF-7 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although 2-arylbenzofuran phytoalexins are known for decades, their anticancer activity has not been studied systematically. We have previously reported on the isolation and the estrogen receptor (ER) modulation properties of three new 2-arylbenzofurans from Onobrychis ebenoides, ebenfuran I [2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5-hydroxy-6-methoxy-benzofuran], ebenfuran 11 [2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-formyl-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-benzofuran] and ebenfuran III [2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-formyl-4-hydroxy-6-methoxy-5-(3-methyl-buten-2-yl)-benzofuran]. We now show that, while I and 11 could stimulate the proliferation of MCF-7 cells, III was inhibitory in a proliferation-dependent manner. III inhibited the growth of all human cancer cells examined, regardless of ER or multidrug resistance status. Estradiol rendered MCF-7 cells more sensitive to 111, and this coincided with the ability of the hormone at concentrations >= 0.1 nM to bind to the ER of the cells and stimulate their proliferation in the presence of III. Cell proliferation stimulating concentrations of I and 11 also enhanced the effect of III on MCF-7 cells. However, dehydroepiandrosterone and dihydrotestosterone were ineffective in this respect. Ill-treated MCF-7 cells exhibited G1 phase arrest followed by detachment-induced cell death and/or apoptosis in the adherent fraction, pronounced induction of Bax and suppression of estradiol induction of Bcl-2. Our data indicate that the largely unexplored pool of benzofuran phytoalexins includes entities potentially suitable for chemoprevention and treatment of human cancer. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据