4.3 Review

The role of cytokines and chemokines in the development of steatohepatitis

期刊

SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 173-193

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-979470

关键词

endotholium; steatohepatitis; chemokines; ethanol; inflammation; adhesion molecules

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [5R01AA014257] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G9818340B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) share similar morphological characteristics despite the obvious etiological differences between the two conditions. In both conditions the first manifestation of injury is the accumulation of fat within hepatocytes (steatosis), and in a proportion of patients this is followed by the development of necroinflammatory activity that leads to cirrhosis. Steatosis alone is considered to be relatively innocuous and is usually reversible, and it is the development of liver cell ballooning and inflammation (steatohepatitis) that determines whether a patient progresses to irreversible liver damage and fibrosis. This has led to the two-hit theory in which the first hit is accumulation of fat in the liver and the second hit involves all inflammatory insult or challenge to the liver, for example, through oxidative stress or ill response to pathogenic stimuli such as endotoxin. Although the nature of the hits remains poorly understood, it is clear that the critical event in progression is the development of inflammation, and the fact that it is impossible to distinguish alcoholic from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis on histological grounds suggests that common pathogenic mechanisms are involved. We focus on the role of cytokines and particularly chemokines in instigating and driving the inflammatory infiltrate in steatohepatitis. A better understanding of this process might allow therapeutic intervention to switch off the inflammatory response before irreversible damage occurs in both ALD and NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据