4.5 Article

Persistently high levels of periodontal pathogens associated with preterm pregnancy outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 833-841

出版社

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060201

关键词

bacteria; immune response; periodontitis; pregnancy

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00046] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-012453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Few studies examining the association between periodontal diseases and preterm birth have explored the underlying microbial and antibody responses associated with oral infection. Methods: A nested case-control study was performed using data from a recent interventional trial following the delayed-treatment control group of 31 subjects with periodontal diseases. The levels of eight oral bacteria and the maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses in serum to these bacteria were measured at anteparturn and postpartum visits to determine the relationship to cases (preterm delivery <37 weeks' gestation) and controls (term delivery). Results: Anteparturn, the levels of periodontal pathogens tended to be higher in the preterm (case group) deliveries compared to the term deliveries (control group). Maternal anti-Porphyromonas gingivalis IgG was significantly lower in the preterm group compared to the term group (P= 0.028). Postpartum, levels of P. gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Prevotella intermedia, and Prevotella nigrescens were statistically significantly higher in preterm births compared to term deliveries, adjusting for baseline levels. The joint effects of red and orange microbial clusters were significantly higher in the preterm group compared to the term group. Conclusions: High levels of periodontal pathogens and low maternal IgG antibody response to periodontal bacteria during pregnancy are associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery. Further studies elucidating the role of the microbial load and maternal immune response as related to pregnancy outcome seem merited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据