4.7 Article

Endogenous urate production augments plasma antioxidant capacity in healthy, lowland subjects exposed to high altitude

期刊

CHEST
卷 131, 期 5, 页码 1473-1478

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-2235

关键词

altitude; free radicals; hypoxia; oxidative stress; uric acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Both tissue hypoxia in vitro, and whole-body hypoxia in vivo, have been found to promote the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are potentially damaging to the cardiovascular system. Antioxidant systems protect against oxidative damage by ROS and may exhibit some degree of responsiveness to oxidative stimuli. Production of urate, a potent soluble antioxidant, is increased in hypoxic conditions. We aimed to determine whether urate is an important antioxidant defense in healthy subjects exposed to hypoxia. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of 25 healthy lowland volunteers during acute exposure to high altitude (4 days at 3,600 in, followed by 10 days at 5,200 in) on the Apex high-altitude research expedition to Bolivia. We measured markers of oxidative stress (8-isoprostane F2), serum urate concentration, and total plasma antioxidant activity by two techniques: 2,2'-amino-di-[3-ethylbenzthiazole sulfonate] spectrophotometry (total antioxidant status [TAS]) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). Results: On ascent, F2-isoprostane levels were significantly elevated compared with those at sea level (p < 0.01). After 1 week at high altitude, plasma antioxidant capacity (AOC) by both TAS and ECL, and serum urate concentration were significantly elevated (each p < 0.01 vs sea level), and F2-isoprostane levels were reduced to values at sea level. There was a highly significant correlation between plasma urate and AOC at this stage (ECL, r(2) = 0.59, p = 0.0001; TAS, r(2) = 0.30, p = 0.0062). Conclusions: Our results support the hypothesis that urate may act as a responsive endogenous antioxidant in high-altitude hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据