4.5 Article

Subthreshold and superthreshold coexistence of pathogen variants: The impact of host age-structure

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES
卷 207, 期 1, 页码 58-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.09.010

关键词

chronological age structure; multiple pathogen variants; coexistence; subthreshold dominance equilibria; weakly subthreshold coexistence; strongly subthreshold coexistence; induced subthreshold coexistence

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM060792-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that in the most general epidemic models with multiple pathogen variants a competitive exclusion principle is valid, such that the variant with the highest reproduction number eliminates the rest. Mechanisms such as super-infection, coinfection, and cross-immunity can lead to pathogen polymorphism where multiple strains coexist. It is also known that variability of infectivity with host age can destabilize the endemic equilibrium and cause oscillations. In this article we show that the hosts' chronological age can itself lead to coexistence of microparasites in the most basic model where competitive exclusion will occur without the age structure. Moreover, the host age-structure leads to multiple subthreshold dominance equilibria, and both weakly and strongly subthreshold coexistence. We find that the two pathogens cannot cooperate to persist subthreshold if neither one of them can persist subthreshold by itself. If, however, one of them can persist subthreshold by itself, it can cause the two pathogens to coexist in a strongly subthreshold equilibrium. The second strain that persists subthreshold through the mediation of the first always has a lower virulence. Our results show that age structure in infectivity can permit the coexistence of competing pathogens when the incidence is of proportionate mixing type (frequency-dependent transmission) and at least one of the strains is virulent. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据