4.6 Article

Fentanyl Added to Propofol Anesthesia Elongates Sinus Node Recovery Time in Pediatric Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 108, 期 2, 页码 456-460

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819002d4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In some types of pediatric supraventricular tachycardia, reentrant mechanisms are sensitive to enhanced vagal tone. Propofol is a feasible anesthetic for pediatric electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Although fentanyl and propofol infusions both enhance cardiac vagal tone, it is unclear whether the combination of propofol and fentanyl has a potential to enhance it. In this study, we evaluated the hypothesis that fentanyl combined with propofol could alter cardiac electrophysiological activities in pediatric patients undergoing electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS: Twenty-seven pediatric patients (9 Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, 7 concealed accessory pathway and 11 atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia) were enrolled in this study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol at a rate of 100-167 mu g . kg(-1) . min(-1). During a stable anesthetic state, the calculated sinoatrial conduction time and corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) were measured before and after fentanyl administration. The fentanyl dose consisted of an initial 2.0 mu g/kg IV bolus and subsequent continuous infusion of 0.075 . mu g . kg(-1) . min(-1). RESULTS: Bispectral Index scores and systemic blood pressure remained unchanged throughout the examinations. Fentanyl administration significantly prolonged CSNRT (P = 0.005) but not calculated sinoatrial conduction time (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Since an enhanced cardiac vagal tone is one of the causative factors for prolonged CSNRT, our findings greatly support the hypothesis that fentanyl combined with propofol has a potential to enhance cardiac vagal tone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据