4.1 Article

Long-term treatment of central Cushing's syndrome with rosiglitazone

期刊

出版社

JOHANN AMBROSIUS BARTH VERLAG MEDIZINVERLAGE HEIDELBERG GMBH
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-970162

关键词

glucocorticoids; hormones; rosiglitazone; Cushing's disease; pituitary adenoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Central Cushing's syndrome is not always curable by surgery or radiation of the pituitary. Medical treatment is often not possible or effective. Some studies revealed beneficial effects of the PPAR gamma (Peroxi some- Proliferator-activator- Receptor-gamma)-agonist rosiglitazone (RG) in in vitro studies, animal models and short term clinical studies. Objective: of this study was to observe the long-term effects of RG-treatment on cortisol-and ACTH -secretion, clinical outcomes and morphological changes of the pituitary in patients with persistent ACTH-overproduction despite previous operation and radiation. Design, setting and patients: 14 patients with persistent central ACTH -production were included and monitored over a period up to 12 months. RG was administered daily and increased to a maximum dosage of 24 mg daily, according to the response of ACTH and cortisol secretion. ACTH and cortisol were measured at least every 4 weeks during RG treatment. Results: Patients were treated between 4 and 12 months with RG (mean 6.8 months). Compared to baseline, ACTH- and cortisol levels dropped significantly (p<0.01) after 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28 weeks but thereafter rose again during the study period, despite continuous RG- treatment and dose increase up to the maximum dosage. This was paralleled by reocurrence of clinical symptoms. MRI-scans were performed in 6 patients because of persisting visible adenoma, but showed no morphological changes. Conclusion: RG seems not to be a long-term treatment option for patients with persistent central ACTH-evcess. Though, in order to reduce perioperative complications, short term treatment of patients could be an alternative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据