4.6 Article

Do Variations in the 5-HT3A and 5-HT3B Serotonin Receptor Genes (HTR3A and HTR3B) Influence the Occurrence of Postoperative Vomiting?

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 109, 期 5, 页码 1442-1447

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b2359b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting are unpleasant side effects of general anesthesia. Besides known risk factors (female gender, nonsmoker, history, and opioids), a genetic influence of the serotonin receptor system on the development of nausea and vomiting has repeatedly been proposed. In this pilot study, we therefore investigated the genes of the serotonin receptor subunits A and B (HTR3A and HTR3B) for genetic variants. METHODS: We included 95 patients who had suffered from postoperative vomiting (POV) after general anesthesia and 94 control patients. After DNA isolation, the entire HTR3A and HTR3B coding regions, the 5' flanking regions, and exon/intron boundaries were screened for genetic variants. Correlation of identified genetic variants with POV was determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 16 different variants in the HTR3A gene and 19 in the HTR3B gene. By using a multivariate logistic regression model that also included classical risk factors, the HTR3A variant c1377A>G was associated with a significantly higher risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.972; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.466-6.021; P = 0.003) and the HTR3B variants c5+201_+202delCA (OR 0.421; 95% CI 0.257-0.69; P = 0.001) and c6-137C>T (OR 0.034; 95% CI 0.003-0.332; P = 0.004) were associated with a lower risk for POV. However, all significant genetic variants were located in noncoding regions of their gene. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variations in the HTR3A and HTR3B gene seem to be associated with the individual risk of developing POV. How strong their influence is within the multifactorial genesis of POV needs to be investigated in additional studies with an appropriate sample size. (Anesth Analg 2009:109:1442-7)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据