4.6 Article

High levels of complement C3a receptor in the glomeruli in lupus nephritis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 598-606

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.02.271

关键词

complement; C3a receptor; lupus nephritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Taking into consideration the key role of the complement system in renal diseases, we investigated molecular and cellular properties of the human complement C3a receptor (C3aR) in vitro and in situ, looking at its expression in several human renal pathological states. Methods: Several antibodies were generated and used for immunohistochemistry and Western blot analyses to address C3aR expression and its regulation in vitro on cell lines of myeloid cells and nonmyeloid cell lineages. Furthermore, C3aR distribution was investigated in control nephrectomized kidneys and 116 biopsy specimens from patients with renal diseases, including lupus nephritis (lupus-N). Results: C3aR is a highly N-glycosylated protein with an apparent molecular mass of 65 to 95 kd expressed by myeloid and endothelial cells. C3aR is particularly upregulated in response to interferon gamma treatment, but was unaffected by the other inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and transforming growth factor beta. In normal human kidney, C3aR staining was not observed. However, glomerular C3aR staining was detected in 42.9% of lupus-N specimens in association with immunoglobulin G immune-complex depositions. Staining intensity correlated with disease severity. C3aR was found in the endothelial area of 81.3% of samples classified as World Health Organization class IV with active lesions. Conversely, C3aR was not detected by means of immunohistochemistry in kidneys from patients with other renal diseases. Conclusion: Our data indicate that C3aR expression is tightly regulated and altered in certain disease conditions. C3aR may be used as a unique biomarker of diagnosis and disease activity in patients with lupus-N.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据