4.2 Article

Activity and stability of human kalikrein-2-specific linear and cyclic peptide inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 348-353

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/psc.849

关键词

cancer; human kallikrein-2; prostate; synthetic peptides; resistance against protcolysis; stability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human glandular kallikrein (KLK2) is a highly prostate-specific serine protease, which is mainly excreted into the seminal fluid, but part of which is also secreted into circulation from prostatic tumors. Since the expression level of KLK2 is elevated in aggressive tumors and it has been suggested to mediate the metastasis of prostate cancer, inhibition of the proteolytic activity of KLK2 is of potential therapeutic value. We have previously identified several KLK2-specific linear peptides by phage display technology. Two of its synthetic analogs, A R R P A P A P G (KLK2a) and G A A R F K V W W A A G (KLK2b), show specific inhibition of KLK2 but their sensitivity to proteolysis in vivo may restrict their potential use as therapeutic agents. In order to improve the stability of the linear peptides for in vivo use, we have prepared cyclic analogs and compared their biological activity and their structural stability. A series of cyclic variants with cysteine bridges were synthesized. Cyclization inactivated one peptide (KLK2a) and its derivatives, while the other peptide (KLK2b) and its derivatives remained active. Further-more, backbone cyclization of KLK2b improved significantly the resistance against proteolysis by trypsin and human plasma. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies showed that cyclization of the KLK2b peptides does not make the structures more rigid. In conclusion, we have shown that backbone cyclization of KLK2 inhibitory peptides can be used to increase stability without losing biological activity. This should render the peptides more useful for in vivo applications, such as tumor imaging and prostate cancer targeting. Copyright (C) 2007 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据