4.6 Article

Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the galaxy cluster Abell 209

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 467, 期 2, 页码 427-436

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066994

关键词

gravitational lensing; galaxies : clusters : individual : Abell 209

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Weak lensing applied to deep optical images of clusters of galaxies provides a powerful tool to reconstruct the distribution of the gravitating mass associated to these structures. Aims. We use the shear signal extracted by an analysis of deep exposures of a region centered around the galaxy cluster ABCG209, at redshift z similar to 0.2, to derive both a map of the projected mass distribution and an estimate of the total mass within a characteristic radius. Methods. We use a series of deep archival R-band images from CFHT- 12k, covering an area of similar to 0.3 deg(2). We determine the shear of background galaxy images using a new implementation of the modified Kaiser-Squires-Broadhurst KSB+ pipeline for shear determination, which we has been tested against the Shear TEsting Program 1 and 2 '' simulations. We use mass aperture statistics to produce maps of the 2 dimensional density distribution, and parametric fits using both Navarro-Frenk- White and singular-isothermal-sphere profiles to constrain the total mass. Results. The projected mass distribution shows a pronounced asymmetry, with an elongated structure extending from the SE to the NW. This is in general agreement with the optical distribution previously found by other authors. A similar elongation was previously detected in the X-ray emission map, and in the distribution of galaxy colours. The circular NFW mass profile fit gives a total mass of M-200 = 7.7(-2.7)(+4.3) x 10(14) M-circle dot inside the virial radius r(200) = 1.8 +/- 0.3 Mpc. Conclusions. The weak lensing profile reinforces the evidence for an elongated structure of ABCG209, as previously suggested by studies of the galaxy distribution and velocities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据