4.6 Article

The X-ray and radio connection in low-luminosity active nuclei

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 467, 期 2, 页码 519-527

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066943

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; X-rays : galaxies; galaxies : Seyfert; galaxies : nuclei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of the correlation between the nuclear 2 - 10 keV X-ray and radio ( at 2 cm, 6 cm, and 20 cm) luminosities for a well-defined sample of local Seyfert galaxies. We use a sample of low luminosity radio galaxies (LLRGs) for comparison. In both Seyfert and LLRG samples, X-ray and radio luminosities are significantly correlated over 8 orders of magnitude, indicating that the X-ray and radio emission sources are strongly coupled. Moreover, both samples show a similar regression slope, L-X proportional to L-R(0.97), but Seyfert galaxies are three orders of magnitude less luminous in the radio band than LLRGs. This suggests that either similar physical mechanisms are responsible for the observed emission or a combination of different mechanisms ends up producing a similar correlation slope. Indeed, the common belief for LLRG is that both the X-ray and radio emission are likely dominated by a relativistic jet component, while in Seyfert galaxies the X-ray emission probably arises from a disk-corona system and the radio emission is attributed to a jet/outflow component. We investigate the radio loudness issue in the two samples and find that the Seyfert galaxies and the LLRGs show a different distribution of the radio loudness parameters. No correlation is found between the luminosity and the radio loudness; however, the latter is related to the black hole mass and anti-correlated with the Eddington ratio. The dichotomy in the radio loudness between Seyfert and LLRG observed down to low Eddington ratios, L2-10 keV/ L-Edd similar to 10(-8), does not support the idea that the origin of the radio loudness is due to a switch in the accretion mode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据