4.6 Article

The impact of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity on wind-up

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 1018-1025

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f8dfe

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Elevated restin-blood pressure (BP) and Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are associated with hypoalgesia to acute pain. These associations are significantly altered in chronic pain. We investigated whether degree of wind-up (marker for central sensitization) is similarly influenced by BP and BRS, and whether these associations are altered by chronic pain. METHODS: BP and BRS (sequence method) were assessed in 30 healthy And 26 chronic back pain subjects who then completed a standardized thermal stimulation protocol to assess wind-Up. This protocol was performed tinder placebo and alpha-2 adrenergic (ADRA2) blockade with yohimbine in counterbalanced order to test for the influence of ADRA2 mechanisms. RESULTS: 1) In healthy controls, higher systolic BP was associated with lower wind-Lip (P < 0.05) but this was reversed in chronic pain subjects (P < 0.05); 2) higher BRS was associated with lower wind-up in healthy controls (P < 0,05) but not in the chronic pain group; 3) higher systolic BP was associated with lower BRS only in the chronic pain group (P < 0.05); and 4) ADRA2 receptor blockade did not significantly affect wind-up. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that hypoalgesia associated with elevated resting BP and 1316 in healthy individuals involves both diminished central sensitization (reflected in wind-Lip) and enhanced descending inhibition. The presence of chronic pain significantly alters the nature of these interactions. The reversal of normal interactions between overlapping systems modulating cardio vascular systems and pain in chronic pain patients may shift the healthy buffering of BP and heart rate toward instability and eventual higher BP and cardiovascular morbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据