4.7 Article

Does diabetes mellitus target motor neurons?

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 301-311

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.11.016

关键词

diabetic neuropathy; polyneuropathy; motor neurons; neuromascular junction; motor units; motor axons

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pattern of peripheral neurodegeneration occurs in chronic diabetes mellitus in which an early, but selective retraction of distal axons may occur prior to any irretrievable neuronal loss. Clinical observations suggest that sensory systems undergo damage before those of motor neurons. In this work, we examined the fate of the spinal motor neuron in a long-term chronic model of experimental (streptozotocin-induced) diabetes already known to be associated with substantial loss of sensory neurons. The integrity, physiological function, and critical forms of protein expression of the full motor neuron tree was examined in mice exposed to 8 months of diabetes. Motor neurons developed progressive features of distal loss of axonal terminals but without perikaryal dropout, indicating distal axon retraction. While numbers and caliber of motor neuron perikarya and their nerve trunk axons were preserved, axons developed conduction velocity slowing, loss of motor units and neuromuscular junctions, and compensatory single motor unit action potential enlargement. Four critical proteins directly linked to diabetic complications were altered in motor neurons of diabetic mice: an elevated perikaryal expression of RAGE and PARP, molecules associated with cellular stress, along with concurrent rises in HSP-27 and pAKT, molecules alternatively identified with neuroprotective survival. Moreover, Akt mRNA was increased in diabetic lumbar spinal cords. Overall these findings indicate that although motor neurons are resistant to irretrievable dropout, they are targeted nonetheless by diabetes and gradually withdraw their terminals from distal innervation. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据