4.3 Article

Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: A multi-femur finite element analysis

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 422-430

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.001

关键词

hip; resurfacing; cement; finite element analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Femoral head resurfacing is a popular procedure for younger active hip replacement patients. Two major cementing techniques are used in femoral component fixation; producing varying cement mantle thicknesses. Each technique has benefits, but it is not known if cement mantle thickness is detrimental to load transfer within the proximal femur. Methods. This study uses computer tomography based finite element analysis to determine the effect of cement mantle thickness on strain in the resurfaced femoral head. A group of 16 femurs were investigated to take into account inter-patient variation; a factor often over-looked in such studies. Findings. Results showed strain in the proximal femoral head to decrease with increasing cement thickness, with a slight increase in strain in the posterior-superior neck. Cementing of the implant guide-pin produced marked reductions in strain in the head and neck except for the posterior inferior neck; where it increased slightly. Interpretation. The study concluded that a thicker cement mantle increases strain shielding within the superior resurfaced femoral head; although short to medium term clinical trials do not suggest these factors to be of much concern. The analysis also found strain to increase around the inferior head-neck junction with a thinner mantle. Cementing the guide pin resulted in increased strain shielding whilst simultaneously shifting peak loads distally along the femoral neck. This work found that modelling a group of femurs was a useful tool for better interpreting the loading in the resurfaced femur. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据