4.5 Article

Prevalence of cold-related complaints, symptoms and injuries in the general population:: the FINRISK 2002 cold substudy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 441-448

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00484-006-0076-1

关键词

cold-related illnesses; respiratory symptoms; cardiac symptoms; musculoskeletal pain; peripheral circulation symptoms; white fingers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of cold-related complaints and symptoms in the general population has remained unknown. As part of the nationwide FINRISK 2002 health survey performed in Finland, 8,723 people aged 25-64 years filled in a questionnaire asking about the number of hours spent weekly in cold air, their sensations during cold exposure, cold-related complaints, symptoms of diseases, and degradation of performance. Cold thermal sensations at +5 degrees C to -5 degrees C were reported by 35% of men and 46% of women. Almost all subjects reported at least some cold-related complaints, most commonly musculoskeletal pain (men 30%, women 27%), followed by respiratory (25% /29%), white finger (15% /18%) and episodic peripheral circulation symptoms (12% /15%). Decreased mental or physical performance in cold was reported by 75% of men and 70% of women, most commonly impairing manual dexterity and tactile sense. With declining temperature, the first symptom to emerge was pain in the elbow or the forearm (at -3 degrees C), followed by increased excretion of mucus from the lungs (-5 degrees C), while most other symptoms appeared only at lower temperatures of -15 degrees C to -20 degrees C. Most symptoms showed little or no association with the weekly duration of exposure, with the exception of cold-induced pain at most sites. Although, in general, Finns are well adapted to the cold climate, the high prevalence of cold-related complaints poses a challenge to the health care system in terms of decreased performance and the possibility that such symptoms predict more serious health effects, such as increased mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据