4.6 Article

Cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein regulates chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 1544-1551

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0673

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0400302] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0400302] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0400302] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combination treatment regimens that include topoisomerase-II -targeted drugs, such as doxorubicin, are widely used in the treatment of breast cancer. Previously, we showed that IFN-gamma and doxorubicin cotreatment synergistically induced apoptosis in MDA435 breast cancer cells in a signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 -dependent manner. In this study, we found that this synergy was caspase-8 dependent. In addition, we found that IFN-gamma down-regulated the expression of the caspase-8 inhibitor cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP). Furthermore, IFN-gamma down-regulated c-FLIP in a manner that was dependent on the transcription factors signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and IFN regulatory factor-1. However, IFN-gamma had no effect on c-FLIP mRNA levels, indicating that c-FLIP was down-regulated at a posttranscriptional level following IFN-gamma treatment. Characterization of the functional significance of c-FLIP modulation by small interfering RNA gene silencing and stable overexpression studies revealed it to be a key regulator of IFN-gamma and doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in MDA435 cells. Analysis of a panel of breast cancer cell lines indicated that c-FLIP was an important general determinant of doxorubicin- and IFN-gamma induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, c-FLIP gene silencing sensitized MDA435 cells to other chemotherapies, including etoposide, mitoxantrone, and SN-38. These results suggest that c-FLIP plays a pivotal role in modulating drug-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据