4.0 Article

Chondrogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells photoencapsulated within poly(ethylene glycol)-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine thiol-methacrylate mixed-mode networks

期刊

TISSUE ENGINEERING
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 1025-1034

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.0126

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE012998-08, R01 DE012998, R01 DE012998-07, DE12998] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) encapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogels was studied in the presence and absence of 5 ng/mL transforming growth factor beta and chondrogenic medium to better understand the role of the gel environment on this process. The lack of any cell-polymer interactions led to decreasing cell viability, as measured using adenosine triphosphate, over a 14-day period. The extent of chondrogenic differentiation was evaluated by immunostaining, and although viability dramatically decreased, cells cultured in chondrogenic differentiation medium expressed higher levels of collagen type II. Cells cultured in hMSC control medium remained undifferentiated and continued to express CD105, a MSC marker. To increase cell survival, arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (RGDS) was incorporated into gels using a novel mixed-mode thiol-ene reaction by synthesizing a cysteinecysteine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid- serine-cysteine-cysteine-glycine, N-terminus to C-terminus peptide sequence with pendant cysteine residues. A concentration of 5mM RGDS incorporated into the network maintained 75% viability in control cultures. Further studies demonstrated that 5-mM RGDS chondrogenic cultures had greater gene expression for aggrecan and collagen II in conjunction with producing twice as much glycosaminoglycan as 0-mM chondrogenic cultures and 7 times that of control cultures. Incorporation of this peptide sequence not only allows for sustained viability, but also contributes to initiating chondrogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据