4.0 Article

Interactions affecting the Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols in vivo

出版社

VERLAG HANS HUBER
DOI: 10.1024/0300-9831.77.3.224

关键词

quercetin; catechin; food matrix; tea; absorption; pharmacokinetics; antioxidant; lipid; emulsifier; ethanol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyphenols are widely abundant dietary constituents in plants that are associated with health-promoting effects. This review summarizes factors influencing the bioavailability of polyphenols, specifically flavanols, flavonols, flavanones, flavones, and hydroxycinnamic (phenolic) acids. Most factors tested so far indicate that bioaccessibility, defined as, the amount of compound reaching the enterocyte in a form suitable for absorption, is the most important factor determining the absorption in the gut. Factors leading to an improved absorption of flavonols, notably quercetin and its metabolites, are primarily the nature of the attached sugar, and secondly, the solubility as modified by ethanol, fat, and emulsifier's. The absorption of flavanols, notably green tea catechins, is affected by epimerization reactions occurring during processing, the presence of lipid and carbohydrate, and is improved by the presence of piperine and tartaric acid. Flavanones, such as hesperidin, are strongly affected by the type of attached sugar. Phenolic acids are affected by the attached sugar, which can covalently link these compounds to the cereal bran matrix. In the few examples tested, absorption of polyphenols is dependent on release from the food matrix. There are only a few examples reported, but where information is available, the absorption increases with dose but is sometimes linear and sometimes saturated. The lack of systematic information on the effects of other components on the bioavailability of polyphenols needs to be addressed, and more human studies should be conducted in this field to establish general principles affecting absorption in vivo. Information derived from such experiments could be useful for the optimal design of future bioefficacy studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据