4.6 Article

Activity and kinematics of ultracool dwarfs, including an amazing flare observation

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 133, 期 5, 页码 2258-2273

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/512158

关键词

galaxy : stellar content; solar neighborhood; stars : activity; stars : flare; stars : late-type; stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the activity and kinematics of a representative volume-limited (20 pc) sample of 152 late-M and L dwarfs (M7-L8) photometrically selected from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Using new proper-motion measurements and spectrophotometric distance estimates, we calculate tangential velocities. The sample has a mean tangential velocity of < V-tan > = 31.5 km s(-1), a velocity dispersion of sigma tan = 20.7 km s(-1), and a maximum tangential velocity of V-tan = 138.8 km s(-1). These kinematic results are in excellent agreement with previous studies of ultracool dwarfs in the local solar neighborhood. H alpha emission, an indicator of chromospheric activity, was detected in 63 of 81 late-M dwarfs and in 16 of 69 L dwarfs examined. We find a lack of correlation between activity strength, measured by log (F-H alpha /F-bol), and V-tan, although velocity distributions suggest that the active dwarfs in our sample are slightly younger than the inactive dwarfs. Consistent with previous studies of activity in ultracool dwarfs, we find that the fraction of H alpha-emitting objects per spectral type peaks at spectral type M7 and declines through mid-L dwarfs. Activity strength is similarly correlated with spectral type for types later than M7. Eleven dwarfs out of 150 show evidence of variability, ranging from small fluctuations to large flare events. We estimate a flare cycle of similar to 5% for late-M dwarfs and similar to 2% for L dwarfs. Observations of strong, variable activity on the L1 dwarf 2MASS J10224821+5825453 and an amazing flare event on the M7 dwarf 2MASS J1028404-143843 are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据