4.5 Article

Potential sources of background contaminants in solid phase extraction and microextraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1029-1036

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200600358

关键词

background contamination; sample preparation; solid-phase extraction; solid-phase microextraction

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES005022, ES05022] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study to identify the sources of background contamination from SPE, using a C-18 sorbent, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), using a 70 Pin carbowax/divinylbenzene (CW/DVB) fiber, was carried out. To determine the source of contamination, each material used in the procedure was isolated and examined for their contribution. The solid-phase column components examined were: sorbent material and frits, column housings and each solvent used to elute analytes off the column. The components examined in the SPME procedure were: SPME fiber, SPME vials, water (HPLC grade), and salt (sodium chloride) used to increase the ionic strength. The majority of the background contaminants from SPE were found to be from the SPE sorbent material and frits. The class of contaminants extracted during a blank extraction were phthalates and other plasticizers used during the manufacturing process. All had blank levels corresponding to measured concentrations below 2 ng/mL, except for undecane, which had a concentration of 5.4 ng/mL. The most prevalent contaminants in the SPME blank procedure are 1,9-nonanediol, a mixture of phthalates and highly bis-substituted phenols. All the concentrations were below 2 ng/mL, with the exception of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, which had concentrations ranging from 5 to 20 ng/mL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据