4.6 Article

Phenotypic characterization of taste cells of the mouse small intestine

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00504.2006

关键词

enteroendocrine cells; alpha-gustducin; glucagon-like peptide-1; 5-HT; ulex europaeus agglutinin-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutrient-evoked gastrointestinal reflexes are likely initiated by specialized epithelial cells located in the small intestine that detect luminal stimuli and release mediators that activate vagal endings. The G-protein alpha-gustducin, a key signal molecule in lingual taste detection, has been identified in mouse small intestine, where it may also subserve nutrient detection; however, the phenotype of alpha-gustducin cells is unknown. Immunohistochemistry was performed throughout the mouse small intestine for alpha-gustducin, enteroendocrine cell markers 5-HT and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and brush cell markers neuronal nitric oxide synthase and Ulex europaeus agglutinin-1 (UEA-1) lectin binding, singly, and in combination. alpha-Gustducin was expressed in solitary epithelial cells of the mid to upper villus, which were distributed in a regional manner with most occurring within the midjejunum. Here, 27% of alpha-gustducin cells colabeled for 5-HT and 15% for GLP-1; 57% of alpha-gustducin cells colabeled UEA-1, with no triple labeling. alpha-Gustducin cells that colabeled for 5- HT or GLP-1 were of distinct morphology and exhibited a different alpha-gustducin immunolabeling pattern to those colabeled with UEA-1. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase was absent from intestinal epithelium despite strong labeling in the myenteric plexus. We conclude that subsets of enteroendocrine cells in the midjejunum and brush cells (more generally distributed) are equipped to utilize alpha-gustducin signaling in mice. Intestinal taste modalities may be signaled by these enteroendocrine cells via the release of 5-HT, GLP-1, or coexpressed mediators or by brush cells via a nonnitrergic mediator in distinct regions of the intestine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据