4.6 Article

Gangliosides contribute to stability of paranodal junctions and ion channel clusters in myelinated nerve fibers

期刊

GLIA
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 746-757

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20503

关键词

node of Ranvier; axo-glial junction; ganglioside; lipid raft; autoimmune neuropathy

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 044916] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paranodal axo-glial junctions are important for ion channel clustering and rapid action potential propagation in myelinated nerve fibers. Paranode formation depends on the cell adhesion molecules neurofascin (NF) 155 in glia, and a Caspr and contactin heterodimer in axons. We found that antibody to ganglioside GM1 labels paranodal regions. Autoantibodies to the gangliosides GM1 and GD1a are thought to disrupt nodes of Ranvier in peripheral motor nerves and cause Guillain-Barre syndrome, an autoimmune neuropathy characterized by acute limb weakness. To elucidate ganglioside function at and near nodes of Ranvier, we examined nodes in mice lacking gangliosides including GM1 and GD1a. In both peripheral and central nervous systems, some paranodal loops failed to attach to the axo-lemma, and immunostaining of Caspr and NF155 was attenuated. K+ channels at juxtaparanodes were mislocalized to paranodes, and nodal Na+ channel clusters were broadened. Abnormal immunostaining at paranodes became more prominent with age. Moreover, the defects were more prevalent in ventral than dorsal roots, and less frequent in mutant mice lacking the b-series gangliosides but with excess GM1 and GD1a. Electrophysiological studies revealed nerve conduction slowing and reduced nodal Na+ current in mutant peripheral motor nerves. The amounts of Caspr and NF155 in low density, detergent insoluble membrane fractions were reduced in mutant brains. These results indicate that gangliosides are lipid raft components that contribute to stability and maintenance of neuron-glia interactions at paranodes. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据