4.1 Article

The value of quantifying 18F-FDG uptake in thyroid nodules found incidentally on whole-body PET-CT

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 373-381

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3280964eae

关键词

F-18-FDG PET-CT; thyroid nodules; standard uptake value (SUV) focal thyroid FDG uptake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine if quantification of [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) uptake in a thyroid nodule found incidentally on whole-body F-18+DG positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to discriminate between malignant and benign aetiology. Methods A retrospective review of all patients with focally high uptake in the thyroid as an incidental finding on F-18-FDG PET-CT from May 2003 through May 2006. The uptake in the nodules was quantified using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The aetiology was determined by cytology and/or ultrasound, or on histopathology. Results Incidental focally high uptake was found in 79/7347 patients (1.1%). In 31/48 patients with adequate follow-up, a benign aetiology was determined. Median SUVmax for the benign group was 5.6, range 2.5-53. Malignancy was confirmed in 15/48 patients. The malignancies were papillary thyroid carcinoma in 12, metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma in one, and lymphoma in two. Median SUVmax for the malignant lesions was 6.4, range 3.5-16. Cytology suspicious for follicular carcinoma was found in 2/48 patients. No statistical difference (P=0.12) was found among the SUVmax between the benign and malignant groups. Conclusion Focally high uptake of F-18-FDG in the thyroid as an incidental finding occurred in 1.1% of the patients. Malignancy was confirmed or was suspicious in 17/48 (35%) of the patients that had adequate follow-up. There was no significant difference in the SUVmax between benign and malignant nodules. Nucl Med Commun 28:373-381 (c) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据