4.7 Article

Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia compared to healthy controls and patients with depression:: Evidence from event-related fMRI

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 1551-1561

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.041

关键词

working memory; schizophrenia; depression; fMRI; prefrontal cortex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies on working memory (WM) dysfunction in schizophrenia have reported several functionally aberrant brain areas including the lateral prefrontal cortex, superior temporal areas and the striatum. However, less is known about the relationship of WM-dysfunction, cerebral activation, task-accuracy and diagnostic specificity. Using a novel WM-task and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we studied healthy control subjects (n=17) and partially remitted, medicated inpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia (n=19) and major depressive disorder (n=12). Due to the event-related technique, we excluded incorrectly performed trials, thus controlling for accuracy-related activation confounds. Compared with controls, patients with schizophrenia showed less activation in frontoparietal and subcortical regions at high cognitive load levels. Compared with patients with depression, schizophrenic patients showed less prefrontal activation in left inferior frontal cortex and right cerebellum. In patients with schizophrenia, a lack of deactivation of the superior temporal cortex was found compared to both healthy controls and patients with depression. Thus, we could not confirm previous findings of impaired lateral prefrontal activation during WM performance in schizophrenic patients after the exclusion of incorrectly performed or omitted trials in our functional analysis. However, superior temporal cortex dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia may be regarded as schizophrenia-specific finding in terms of psychiatric diagnosis specificity. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据