4.8 Article

A monomeric G protein-coupled receptor isolated in a high-density lipoprotein particle efficiently activates its G protein

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611448104

关键词

beta(2)-adrenergic receptor; single-molecule spectroscopy; oligomerization

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P60 DK020572, P60DK-20572] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM068603, GM068603] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS028471, R37 NS028471, NS28471] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to a diverse array of ligands, mediating cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters, as well as the senses of smell and taste. The structures of the GPCR rhodopsin and several G proteins have been determined by x-ray crystallography, yet the organization of the signaling complex between GPCRs and G proteins is poorly understood. The observations that some GPCRs are obligate heterodimers, and that many GPCRs form both homo- and heterodimers, has led to speculation that GPCR climers may be required for efficient activation of G proteins. However, technical limitations have precluded a definitive analysis of G protein coupling to monomeric GPCRs in a biochemically defined and membrane-bound system. Here we demonstrate that a prototypical GPCR, the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR), can be incorporated into a reconstituted high-density lipoprotein (rHDL) phospholipid bilayer particle together with the stimulatory heterotrimeric G protein, Gs. Single-molecule fluorescence imaging and FRET analysis demonstrate that a single beta(2)AR is incorporated per rHDL particle. The monomeric beta(2)AR efficiently activates Gs and displays GTP-sensitive allosteric ligand-binding properties. These data suggest that a monomeric receptor in a lipid bilayer is the minimal functional unit necessary for signaling, and that the cooperativity of agonist binding is due to G protein association with a receptor monomer and not receptor oligomerization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据