4.5 Article

Hepatoprotective role of endogenous interleukin-13 in a murine model of acetaminophen-induced liver disease

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 734-744

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/TX600349f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that a deficiency in one or more hepatoprotective regulatory mechanisms may contribute to determining susceptibility in drug-induced liver disease. In the present study, we investigated the role of interleukin (IL)-13 in acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver disease (AILD). Following APAP (200 mg/kg) administration to male C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice, hepatotoxicity developed up to 24 h post-APAP, with a concomitant increase in serum IL-13 concentration. Pretreatment of these mice with an IL-13-neutralizing antibody exacerbated liver injury, as did APAP administration to IL-13 knockout (KO) mice in comparison to WT mice. No difference was observed in either overall APAP-protein adduct formation or liver glutathione levels between KO and WT mice following APAP administration, suggesting that the increased susceptibility of IL-13 KO mice to AILD was not due to enhanced APAP bioactivation but rather injurious downstream events. In this regard, multiplex antibody arrays were used to identify potential IL-13-regulated biomarkers, including various cytokines and chemokines, as well as nitric oxide (NO), associated with AILD that were present at higher concentrations in the sera of APAP-treated IL-13 KO mice than in WT mice. Subsequent inhibition studies determined interferon-gamma, NO, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and natural killer cells with T-cell receptors had pathologic roles in AILD in IL-13 KO mice. Taken together, these results suggest that IL-13 is a critical hepatoprotective factor modulating the susceptibility to AILD and may provide hepatoprotection, in part, by down-regulating protoxicant factors and cells associated with the innate immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据