4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Angiopoietin-1 for myocardial angiogenesis: A comparison between delivery strategies

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 458-465

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.10.022

关键词

angiopoietin-1; angiogenesis; ischaemia; myoblast

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compare the effectiveness of direct adenoviral angiopoietin-1 (Ad-Ang-1) injection with transplantation of skeletal myoblasts (SkMs) over-expressing angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) for angiogenic response and improvement of heart function in an experimental porcine model of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: Ad-Ang-1 was used for intramyocardial injection or transduction of SkMs. Three weeks after coronary artery ligation in 32 female pigs, animals were grouped to receive multiple intramyocardial injections of DMEM without cells (group-1; n = 7), or containing 3 x 10(8) Lac-Z labelled SkMs transduced with Ad-Null vector carrying no gene (group-2; n = 7), or 1 x 10(10) PFU Ad-Ang-1 (group-3; n = 9), or 3 x 10(8) Lac-z labelled SkMs transduced with Ad-Ang-1 (group-4; n = 9). The animals were immunosuppressed for 6-weeks. After euthanasia, their heart tissue was processed for histological studies. Results: Extensive survival of Lac-z positive SkMs was observed in and around the infarct 6 and 12-weeks after transplantation. Fluorescent immunostaining for vWF-VIII at 6-weeks revealed increased blood vessel density (x 100) in group-4 (p < 0.05) as compared with other groups. Regional blood flow (ml/g/min) in the peri-infarct area was improved in group-4 (2.7; p < 0.05) as compared with group-1 (1.2 +/- 0.1), group-2 (1.1 +/- 0.4) and group-3 (1.7 +/- 0.1) at 6-weeks. Similarly, ejection fraction was significantly higher in group-4 (49.2 +/- 5.9%, p = 0.03) as compared with group-1 (36.8 +/- 3%) at 6 weeks. Conclusion: SkMs mediated Ang-1 delivery is associated with improved angiogenic response, regional myocardial perfusion and heart function as compared with direct Ad-Ang-1 administration. (C) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据