4.4 Article

On the accuracy of CartoMerge for guiding posterior left atrial ablation in man

期刊

HEART RHYTHM
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 595-602

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.01.033

关键词

atrial; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; intracardiac echocardiography; electroanatomic mapping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Recent reports suggest that the CartoMerge system is useful for guiding human posterior Left atrial (PLA) endocardial ablation. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of the CartoMerge system during PLA ablation. METHODS Sixteen patients undergoing PLA catheter ablation were studied. In each patient, registration of preoperative computed tomographic (CT) and intraoperative electroanatomic left atrial images was performed to create CartoMerge images. Encircling of right and left pulmonary venous vestibules with ablation points was then performed guided solely by intracardiac echocardiography, with point locations saved on a CartoMerge image to which the operator was blinded. The accuracy of the CartoMerge image was then assessed by measuring the distance from the Location of each ablation point on the image to its actual anatomic location. In five patients, accuracy of registration of each of three left atrial CT images (just prior to mitral valve opening, at end-diastasis, at end-atrial contraction) with the electroanatomic image was compared. In two patients, accuracy of registration using Left atrial image data alone was compared with that which used both Left atrial and thoracic aorta image data. RESULTS In each patient, inaccuracy of the CartoMerge image was apparent, the magnitude of which was similar for right- and left-vestibule ablation points. Accuracy was significantly improved when the end-atrial contraction CT image was used for registration. The inclusion of thoracic aorta image data did not improve accuracy. CONCLUSIONS The CartoMerge system is inaccurate. Inaccuracy may be reduced by using CT and electroanatomic images obtained at the same point in the atrial mechanical cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据