4.6 Article

Biotinylation of TiO2 nanoparticles and their conjugation with streptavidin

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 5630-5637

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la0626656

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoactive TiO2 can be used to mediate a variety of disinfection processes. It was postulated that TiO2 particles could be directed to specific targets of interest using biotin/streptavidin linkages. Biotinylated TiO2 nanoparticles (anatase) were obtained by treating TiO2 nanoparticles with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTS) in anhydrous DMSO, followed by reaction with N-hydroxysuccinimidobiotin. Si-29 CP-MAS NMR, C-13 CP-MAS NMR, and FTIR spectra showed that biotin was covalently bound to the TiO2 surface. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrated that prolonging the silanization reaction times led to increasingly thick silsesquioxane coating layers of up to approximately 10 nm. The specific surface area (SSA) of the TiO2 particles decreased from 16 m(2) g(-1) before treatment to 9.1 m(2) g(-1) after aminosilanization and to 8.4 m(2) g(-1) after biotinylation, as measured by nitrogen adsorption. Amino surfaces modified for 4, 16, and 26 h had total amino group densities ranging from 2.9 to 26 to 66 nm(-2), respectively, whereas accessible surface amino group densities ranged from 2.7 to 10 to 17 nm(-2) as shown from nitrogen adsorption, polyelectrolyte titration, conductiometric titration, and biotin assays. Not all the amino groups were accessible for biotinylation: the densities of active biotin were found to be 2.1, 7.0, and 11.5 nm(-2). The ability of the attached biotin to bind to streptavidin was demonstrated by confocal microscopy with the use of fluorescently labeled streptavidin-FITC. Although streptavidin was readily able to bind to biotinylated TiO2 particles, it did not act as a strong flocculating agent for the biotinylated TiO2 particles. The implications of these observations, with respect to particle accessibility to tethered streptavidin, are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据