4.7 Article

350 μm observations of ultraluminous infrared galaxies at intermediate redshifts

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 660, 期 2, 页码 1198-1208

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/514809

关键词

galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; infrared : ISM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present 350 mu m observations of 36 ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) at intermediate redshifts (0.089 <= z <= 0.926) using the Submillimeter High Angular Resolution Camera II (SHARC-II) on the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO). In total, 28 sources are detected at S/N >= 3, providing the first flux measurements longward of 100 mu m for a statistically significant sample of ULIRGs in the redshift range 0.1 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 1.0. Combining our 350 mu m flux measurements with the existing IRAS 60 and 100 mu m data, we fit a single-temperature model to the spectral energy distribution (SED) and thereby estimate dust temperatures and far-IR luminosities. Assuming an emissivity index of beta = 1.5, we find a median dust temperature and far-IR luminosity of T-d = 42.8 +/- 7.1 K and log (L-FIR/L-circle dot) = 12.2 +/- 0.5, respectively. The far-IR-radio correlation observed in local star-forming galaxies is found to hold for ULIRGs in the redshift range 0.1 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 0.5, suggesting that the dust in these sources is predominantly heated by starbursts. We compare the far- IR luminosities and dust temperatures derived for dusty galaxy samples at low and high redshifts with our sample of ULIRGs at intermediate redshift. A general L-FIR-T-d relation is observed, albeit with significant scatter due to differing selection effects and variations in dust mass and grain properties. The relatively high dust temperatures observed for our sample compared to that of high-z submillimeter-selected starbursts with similar far-IR luminosities suggest that the dominant star formation in ULIRGs at moderate redshifts takes place on smaller spatial scales than is found at higher redshifts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据