4.5 Article

Streamflow response to seasonal snow cover mass changes over large Siberian watersheds

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JF000518

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used remotely sensed weekly snow water equivalent ( SWE) data ( 1988-2000) to investigate streamflow response to seasonal snow cover change in the large Siberian watersheds ( the Ob, Yenisei, and Lena basins). We quantified the seasonal cycles and variations of snow cover mass and river streamflow and identified a clear correspondence of river discharge to seasonal snow cover mass change. We also examined and compared the weekly mean streamflow with the weekly basin SWE for the study period. The results revealed a strong relation between the streamflow and snow cover mass change during the spring melt season over the large Siberian watersheds. This relationship provides a practical procedure of using remotely sensed snow cover information for snowmelt runoff estimation over the large northern watersheds. Analyses of extreme ( high/low) SWE cases ( years) and the associated streamflow conditions indicate an association of high ( low) flood peak with high ( low) maximum SWE in the Ob and Yenisei basins. Comparative analyses of weekly basin SWE data versus snow cover extent ( SCE), peak snowmelt floods, and climatic variables ( temperature and winter precipitation) indicate consistency among basin SWE, SCE, and temperature but incompatibility between basin SWE and winter precipitation, particularly for the Lena watershed. The inconsistency suggests uncertainties in determination of basin winter snowfall amounts and limitations in applications of the SWE retrieval algorithm over large watersheds/regions with very different physical characteristics. Overall, the results of this study clearly demonstrate that the weekly SWE data/products derived from microwave remote sensing technology are useful in understanding seasonal streamflow changes in the arctic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据