4.6 Article

Pertussis toxin by inducing IL-6 promotes the generation of IL-17-producing CD4 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 178, 期 10, 页码 6123-6129

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6123

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CO-12400] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compelling evidence has now demonstrated that IL-17-producing CD4 cells (Th17) are a major contributor to autoimmune pathogenesis, whereas CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells (Treg) play a major role in suppression of autoimmunity. Differentiation of proinflammatory Th17 and immunosuppressive Treg from naive CD4 cells is reciprocally related and contingent upon the cytokine environment. We and others have reported that in vivo administration of pertussis toxin (PTx) reduces the number and function of mouse Treg. In this study, we have shown that supernatants from PTx-treated mouse splenic cells, which contained IL-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines, but not PTx itself, overcame the inhibition of proliferation seen in cocultures of Treg and CD4(+)CD25(-) T effector cells. This stimulatory effect could be mimicked by individual inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 beta, IL-6, and TNF-a. The combination of these cytokines synergistically stimulated the proliferation of CD4+CD25- T effector cells despite the presence of Treg with a concomitant reduction in the percentage of FoxP3(+) cells and generation of IL-17-expressing cells. PTx generated Th17 cells, while inhibiting the differentiation of FoxP(+) cells, from naive CD4 cells when cocultured with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells from wild-type mice, but not from IL-6(-/-) mice. In vivo treatment with PTx induced IL-17-secreting cells in wild-type mice, but not in IL-6(-/-) mice. Thus, in addition to inhibiting the development of Treg, the immunoadjuvant activity of PTx can be attributable to the generation of IL-6-dependent IL-17-producing CD4 cells. The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 178: 6123-6129.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据