4.6 Article

Modification in adsorption characteristics of activated carbon produced by H3PO4 under flowing gases

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.11.024

关键词

activated carbon; adsorption; peach stones; porosity; H3PO4-activation; lead ions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbons were derived from peach stone shells by H3PO4-scheme under standard conditions: 50% H3PO4 and pyrolysis for 2 hat 500 degrees C. Five carbons were prepared by changing the gas atmosphere during thermal treatment (no external gas, flowing of either nitrogen, carbon dioxide, steam or air). Additional carbon was obtained by extra-heat treatment at 800 degrees C of the standard carbon, for 2 h. Characterization was performed by adsorption of N-2 at 77 K, and testing of capacity was carried out towards p-nitrophenol, methylene blue and lead ions from aqueous solution. All carbons were high quality adsorbents with high surface area and essentially microporous structure with low degree of mesoporosity. Running external gases reduces mostly the carbon porosity, except air and steam which generate higher mesoporosity on expense of microporosity. High uptake of p-nitrophenol appears, affected to low extent with gaseous atmosphere except steam which raises adsorption considerably. Flowing air is the most effective in enhancing the adsorption of methylene blue, which was attributed to the formation of O-functionalities with acidic nature, and to enhancement of wider microporosity. Removal of lead ions from aqueous, non-buffered, solutions was considerable in comparison to previous studies, and attributed to the acidic nature of carbons in addition to the presence of inorganic and organic phosphate compounds. Lead ions removal was considerably enhanced by running air during thermal treatment (two-fold increase) due to the formation of acidic oxygen-functionalities associated with metal exchange by the negatively charged carbon surface. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据