4.8 Article

Polymer electrolytes based on an electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) membrane for lithium batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 167, 期 2, 页码 491-498

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.032

关键词

electrospinning; polymer electrolyte; poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene); fibrous membrane; lithium batteries

资金

  1. National IT Industry Promotion Agency (NIPA), Republic of Korea [C1090-0603-0023] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵C6B1307] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospinning parameters are optimized for the preparation of fibrous membranes of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) {P(VdF-HFP)} that consist of layers of uniform fibres of average diameter 1 mu m. Electrospinning of a 16wt.% solution of the polymer in acetone/N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) (7/3, w/w) at an applied voltage of 18 kV results in obtaining membranes with uniform morphology. Polymer electrolytes (PEs) are prepared by activating the membrane with liquid electrolytes. The fully interconnected porous structure of the host polymer membrane enables high electrolyte uptake and ionic conductivities of 10(-3) Scm(-1) order at 20 degrees C. The PEs have electrochemical stability at potentials higher than 4.5 V versus Li/Li+. A PE based on a membrane with 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC), which exhibits a low and stable interfacial resistance on lithium inetal, is evaluated for discharge capacity and cycle properties in Li/LiFePO4 cells at room temperature and different Current densities. A remarkably good performance with a high initial discharge capacity and low capacity fading on cycling is obtained. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据